Stiga Allround Classic Carbon vs Stiga Emerald VPS V: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Allround Classic Carbon | Stiga Emerald VPS V | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.3/10 |
| feel | Medium stiffness, wood-like touch with carbon crispness, small vibration, large sweet spot | Stiff, hard outer surface with medium throw angle and large sweet spot |
| handle | FL, ST, WRB | Flared (FL), also available in ST and Chinese pen |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 carbon | 5-ply all wood (Ebenholz/dark outer, VPS-treated middle veneers) |
| speed | ALL+ | OFF+ |
| thickness_mm | 5.6 | 6.2 |
| weight_g | 81 | 98 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Stiga Allround Classic Carbon rated 7.8 is a soft, wood-like hybrid for technique development and gentle play, while the Stiga Emerald VPS V rated 8.3 is a premium all-wood OFF+ speed blade with VPS-treated veneers, large sweet spot, and flat-trajectory drives. Emerald is significantly faster (OFF+ vs ALL+) and heavier at 98g versus 81g, suited for advanced attackers not beginners.
Emerald’s stiff construction punishes weak technique while delivering consistent heavy looping dwell. VPS treatment improves consistency and looping dwell. Classic remains the learning tool. Emerald requires technique and arm strength. Both are all-wood or wood-primary construction, but Emerald is the premium offensive choice while Classic is the budget stepping stone. Choose Classic for beginners; choose Emerald for advanced intermediate to competitive attackers.
FAQ
Which is faster?
Emerald is much faster (OFF+ vs ALL+), enabling mid-distance and counter-looping.
Which suits beginners?
Only Classic Carbon. Emerald demands technique and is unsuitable for beginners.
Which loops better?
Emerald’s VPS veneers enhance looping dwell and consistency. Classic good but not specialized.
Which is lighter?
Classic at 81g is much lighter than Emerald at 98g, reducing fatigue.