Stiga Allround Classic Carbon vs Stiga Cybershape Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Allround Classic Carbon | Stiga Cybershape Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | Medium stiffness, wood-like touch with carbon crispness, small vibration, large sweet spot | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade |
| handle | FL, ST, WRB | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 carbon | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) |
| speed | ALL+ | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) |
| thickness_mm | 5.6 | approx 5 mm |
| weight_g | 81 | 85 plus or minus 5 g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Stiga Allround Classic Carbon rated 7.8 is a soft, wood-like learning tool, while the Stiga Cybershape Carbon rated 8.4 is an advanced inner-carbon blade with exceptional large sweet spot positioned higher, head-heavy balance, and a speed rating of 9 out of 10. Cybershape’s hexagonal shape aids serve angles and bat awareness. These serve opposite purposes: Classic teaches beginners, Cybershape attacks competitively.
Cybershape is demanding for intermediate players—compact technique required to avoid overhitting. Its short dwell time challenges looping specialists. Premium pricing around 220 EUR makes it one of the pricier options. Classic is lightweight, forgiving, and budget-friendly. Cybershape is head-heavy, fast, and suited for advanced counter-attackers and backhand-dominant players willing to adapt to the angular shape. ITTF competition approved. Choose Classic for learning; choose Cybershape for fast, aggressive modern offense.
FAQ
Which is faster?
Cybershape is much faster (9.0 rating, OFF-level vs ALL+), enabling mid-distance and far-table pace.
Which suits beginners?
Only Classic Carbon. Cybershape is demanding and unsuitable for developing players.
What about the shape difference?
Cybershape’s hexagonal shape aids serve angles and bat awareness but takes adaptation from oval-blade players.
Which has better blocking?
Both block well, but Cybershape’s head-heavy balance adds natural acceleration advantage.