Stiga Allround Classic Carbon vs Stiga Clipper Wood: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Allround Classic Carbon | Stiga Clipper Wood | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | Medium stiffness, wood-like touch with carbon crispness, small vibration, large sweet spot | solid, medium-stiff, hard fast all-wood with a big sweetspot |
| handle | FL, ST, WRB | FL/ST/AN/PEN |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 carbon | 7W (all wood) - limba outer plies over an ayous core, no carbon or synthetic layers |
| speed | ALL+ | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 5.6 | 6.3 |
| weight_g | 81 | 90 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Stiga Allround Classic Carbon rated 7.8 combines soft, wood-like touch with carbon consistency for beginners, while the Stiga Clipper Wood rated 8.4 is a 7-ply all-wood classic blade with rock-solid blocking, outstanding short-game touch, and a big sweetspot—but at a slower, heavier option. Both prioritize control and feeling, yet differ in approach: Classic via carbon support, Clipper via pure-wood excellence.
Clipper’s real-world speed sits in OFF, not the OFF+ its reputation suggests, and it runs heavy at 90g causing fatigue. Classic at 81g is lighter and slightly faster (ALL+ vs OFF). Clipper excels in blocking and short-game touch with a big sweetspot. Known Stiga splintering tendency means many owners seal Clipper. Both suit close-to-mid-table all-round play, but Clipper is the pure-feel option while Classic is the versatile stepping stone.
FAQ
Which is faster?
Classic Carbon is slightly faster (ALL+ vs OFF), offering more pace.
Which is lighter?
Classic at 81g is lighter than Clipper at 90g, reducing fatigue.
Which blocks better?
Clipper’s rock-solid blocking is superior. Classic good blocking with more feel.
Which requires maintenance?
Clipper prone to splintering and requires sealing. Classic Carbon less maintenance-intensive.