Butterfly Hadraw VK vs Stiga Cybershape Wood: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Hadraw VK | Stiga Cybershape Wood | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.6/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | flexible, high dwell, natural wood feedback | Medium-soft, dwell-heavy, linear feedback |
| handle | FL / ST / AN (Shakehand) | Flare / Straight / Anatomic (Italian wood) |
| plies | 5-ply all wood (Koto outer, Hinoki, Kiri, Ayous core) | 7-ply all wood |
| speed | OFF- | OFF- |
| thickness_mm | 5.7 | 5.8-5.9 mm |
| weight_g | 84 | 80-85 g (base); up to 94 g with CWT weights |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both all-wood OFF- blades targeting spin-first players, but with different toolsets. Hadraw is pure: maximum dwell, natural wood feedback, and lightweight at 84g. Cybershape Wood adds 7-ply construction and optional CWT magnetic weights that allow players to fine-tune racket balance.
For players wanting a finished blade ready to play, the Hadraw is simpler and more tactile. For those who tinker and prefer customization, Cybershape Wood’s magnetic weight system offers flexibility. Both suit intermediate-to-advanced spin players equally well close to mid-distance. Cybershape’s linear feedback is more predictable; Hadraw’s flexible construction makes heavy brush feel richer. Cybershape’s Italian wood handle is premium; Hadraw’s standard geometry suits a broader range of grip sizes.
FAQ
Can you adjust Cybershape Wood balance?
Yes, optional CWT magnetic weights let you add about 6g to mid-handle, changing swing weight. Hadraw has fixed balance.
Which dwell is better?
Hadraw slightly superior due to 5-ply vs Cybershape’s 7-ply, but both are excellent for topspin.
Handle differences?
Hadraw: standard shakehand options. Cybershape: Italian wood handle is wider, premium feel; Straight variant may feel thin for large hands.
Which is cheaper?
Hadraw generally more affordable. Cybershape’s premium Italian handle and adjustability add cost.