Stiga Cybershape Wood vs Stiga Infinity VPS V: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Cybershape Wood | Stiga Infinity VPS V | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.6/10 |
| feel | Medium-soft, dwell-heavy, linear feedback | stiff thin outer (Diamond Touch), medium-hard |
| handle | Flare / Straight / Anatomic (Italian wood) | FL/ST/AN |
| plies | 7-ply all wood | 5W (all wood) |
| speed | OFF- | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 5.8-5.9 mm | 5.8 |
| weight_g | 80-85 g (base); up to 94 g with CWT weights | 88 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Two all-wood designs optimized for different attack patterns. The Stiga Cybershape Wood (8.4) is spin-centric OFF- with dwell-heavy, linear feedback. Its enlarged hexagonal sweetspot and excellent dwell support heavy topspin and service variation. Optional CWT weights customize racket balance. Premium Italian handle ensures secure grip. However, base speed is modest, and you depend on fast rubber pairing and aggressive swinging to compete at distance.
The Stiga Infinity VPS V (8.6) rates highest of these comparisons and balances power and control. Its 5-ply all-wood construction with VPS and Diamond Touch treatment delivers stiff, lively, consistent feedback. Excellent control for an offensive blade, with flex and dwell rewarding heavy brush looping near-to-mid table. Strong stability in fast game and short game. However, it gives up power to carbon blades from far distance, and it ships raw—thin outer veneer needs sealing, and wings may need light sanding.
Summary: Cybershape for topspin-perfectionists; Infinity for dynamic spin-first attackers wanting many gears and solid power. Cybershape is lighter and more balanced; Infinity is raw but more versatile and rated higher (8.6 vs 8.4). Both require commitment to thin outer maintenance.
FAQ
Why does Infinity rate higher than Cybershape?
Infinity’s versatility and stiff-lively outer with many gears for brush looping and fast play outweigh Cybershape’s pure spin focus.
Which is better for heavy brush looping?
Infinity VPS V. Its flex, dwell, and medium arc reward heavy looping near-to-mid table. Cybershape is more linear and predictable.
Why does Cybershape have optional weights?
Because it is lighter and more delicate; CWT weights allow balance customization. Infinity ships heavier and does not need this tuning.
Which blade is more beginner-friendly?
Cybershape. Infinity ships raw and demands sealing and sanding. Cybershape is more finished out of the box.
How do they compare at far distance?
Infinity performs better at mid-distance. Cybershape requires very fast rubber to compete. Neither dominates far distance like carbon blades.