Butterfly Timo Boll Spirit vs Stiga Cybershape Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Timo Boll Spirit | Stiga Cybershape Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 9.0/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | Medium and offensive with notable flex and long dwell, crisp but forgiving for a carbon blade | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade |
| handle | FL / ST / AN | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) |
| plies | 5 wood plies plus 2 arylate-carbon outer layers (5W and 2 ALC) | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) |
| speed | OFF | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) |
| thickness_mm | 5.7 | approx 5 mm |
| weight_g | 87 | 85 plus or minus 5 g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Timo Boll Spirit offers forgiving, long-dwell play suited to looping-focused attackers. Stiga Cybershape Carbon is head-heavy and hexagonal, with faster speed and shorter dwell, optimized for counter-attacking and backhand play.
Choose Spirit if you loop aggressively and want soft, consistent carbon feel across both wings. Choose Cybershape if you are a fast counter-attacker or backhand-dominant player comfortable with unusual shape and shorter dwell. Spirit suits looping; Cybershape suits hitting.
FAQ
Which suits counter-attacking better?
Cybershape, with its head-heavy design and shorter dwell for rapid exchanges.
Which is better for looping?
Spirit, with longer dwell and forgiving feel. Cybershape’s short dwell is less ideal for heavy topspin.
Which has better blocking?
Both block well. Cybershape’s head-heavy balance aids acceleration; Spirit’s dwell aids control.
Are both ITTF approved?
Yes. Cybershape’s hexagonal shape is unusual but competition-legal.