Butterfly Timo Boll ALC vs Xiom Stradivarius: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Timo Boll ALC | Xiom Stradivarius | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 9.0/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | medium | Crisp and solid with low residual vibration; direct ball contact feel with a large sweet spot |
| handle | FL/ST/AN | Flared (FL), Straight (ST) |
| plies | 5W+2 Arylate-Carbon | 5 wood + 2 arylate carbon (Aramid Carbon) |
| speed | OFF | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 5.8 | 5.7 |
| weight_g | 86 | ~85-87 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Timo Boll ALC is the proven gold standard: balanced, forgiving, large sweet spot, and endorsed by elites worldwide. Xiom Stradivarius is an excellent arylate-carbon blade offering similar speed and spin at lower cost, but with stiffer carbon feel and less dwell.
Choose TBALC if you want the safest performance choice and proven pedigree, or if you value smooth dwell. Choose Stradivarius if you prefer crisp carbon feedback, want to save money, and prioritize clean contact feel over maximum dwell. Both are strong offensive blades; Stradivarius is best for players who like direct, rapid counter-attacking.
FAQ
Do they play at similar speeds?
Yes, both are OFF rated. TBALC is slightly more consistent; Stradivarius is crisp but stiffer overall.
Why is Stradivarius cheaper?
Xiom has lower brand prestige and premium than Butterfly internationally, though build quality is comparable.
Which generates more spin?
Both generate excellent spin. TBALC may have a slight dwell advantage; Stradivarius trades dwell for crisp feedback.
Which is better for mid to far distance?
Both excel at distance. TBALC is marginally more consistent on mishits.