Butterfly Primorac vs Stiga Cybershape Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Primorac | Stiga Cybershape Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | medium, classic all-wood, long dwell and high control | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade |
| handle | FL/ST | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) |
| plies | 5W (all wood) — Limba/Limba/Ayous/Limba/Limba | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) |
| speed | OFF- | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) |
| thickness_mm | 6 | approx 5 mm |
| weight_g | 85 | 85 plus or minus 5 g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Butterfly Primorac (8.3) is a timeless all-wood choice with excellent dwell, clean feedback, and outstanding durability. Its classic oval shape and Limba-Limba-Ayous-Limba-Limba construction suit traditional playing styles, especially control and spinning techniques.
Stiga Cybershape Carbon (8.4) breaks the mold with a distinctive hexagonal head shape and inner carbon (CCF) construction. It boasts an exceptionally large sweet spot (verified by KTH labs, placed higher on the blade), outstanding blocking comfort, and head-heavy balance that adds natural acceleration. Speed rating of 9/10 rivals Butterfly’s premium Koto-ALC class. The short dwell is challenging for heavy topspin, and the angular shape requires adaptation on serves and bat angle awareness. At around 220 EUR, it’s premium-priced.
Stay with Primorac if you value dwell, traditional feel, and long-term keeper status. Choose Cybershape if you’re an advanced offensive or counter-attacking player who prizes sweet-spot size, blocking comfort, and head-heavy swing weight over dwell time. Cybershape’s shape is polarizing; if you love it, it’s exceptional. If you dislike the feel, Primorac is the safer choice.
FAQ
Will the hex shape affect my serve feel?
Yes. Service feel is ‘noticeably different from oval blades’ and requires adaptation time. If you have a perfected serve, expect an adjustment period. Primorac’s oval shape is more intuitive.
Is the large sweet spot worth the hex adjustment?
For advanced players, yes. The KTH-verified sweet spot is genuinely larger and positioned higher. For intermediate players, Primorac’s forgiving dwell is more beginner-friendly.
Can heavy topspin loopers use Cybershape?
Not ideally. The short dwell is explicitly ‘challenging for heavy topspin or looping styles.’ Primorac is far better for spin-dominant play.
Is Cybershape’s premium price justified?
For advanced blocking and counter-attacking specialists, yes. For developing intermediates or spin-focused players, Primorac offers better value and longer developmental trajectory.