Butterfly Maze Advance vs Stiga Cybershape Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Maze Advance | Stiga Cybershape Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | soft, controlled, slightly stiff for an all-wood blade | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade |
| handle | FL | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) |
| plies | 5W (all wood) | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) |
| speed | ALL+ | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) |
| thickness_mm | 6.7 | approx 5 mm |
| weight_g | 85 | 85 plus or minus 5 g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Maze Advance is a straightforward all-wood blade: lightweight, affordable, excellent for beginners and blockers, with a conventional oval shape. Stiga Cybershape Carbon is a premium engineering marvel—hexagonal head shape, lab-verified larger sweet spot, head-heavy swing weight, and wood-like CCF carbon—designed for advanced players willing to adapt to its unique geometry.
Go Maze Advance if you’re building fundamentals on a budget with an oval blade. Choose Cybershape Carbon if you’re advanced, want superior blocking and counter-attacking precision, and embrace learning a new blade shape.
FAQ
How does the hexagonal shape actually help?
Wider angles aid serve and return geometry; the unique shape trains bat awareness and gives psychological edge on attacking angles.
Why is Cybershape so much more expensive?
Premium materials, proprietary CCF carbon, lab testing, and the patented hexagonal engineering; Maze Advance is mass-produced all-wood.
Which suits developing players better?
Maze Advance absolutely. Cybershape’s compact stroke requirement and special shape demand proficiency; Advance is forgiving and straightforward.
What’s the actual speed difference?
Cybershape is OFF-class (9/10 rating)—dramatically faster than Maze Advance’s ALL+, but demands active, technical strokes.