Butterfly Lin Gaoyuan ALC vs Stiga Cybershape Wood: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Lin Gaoyuan ALC | Stiga Cybershape Wood | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.7/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | Soft — flexible ALC gives a more wood-like feel than other carbon blades; high dwell time | Medium-soft, dwell-heavy, linear feedback |
| handle | Shakehand (FL, AN, ST options); shorter anatomic handle than Viscaria | Flare / Straight / Anatomic (Italian wood) |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 arylate-carbon (ALC) — 7-ply construction with koto outer layers and inner arylate-carbon fiber | 7-ply all wood |
| speed | OFF (Butterfly rates Reaction 118, mid-fast; equivalent to OFF/OFF+ class) | OFF- |
| thickness_mm | 5.7mm | 5.8-5.9 mm |
| weight_g | 84-87g typical (Butterfly spec approx 87g) | 80-85 g (base); up to 94 g with CWT weights |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Gaoyuan delivers modern carbon performance—fast, predictable, high-spin—while Stiga Cybershape Wood emphasizes forgiveness and dwell through its enlarged hexagonal sweet spot and 7-ply all-wood construction. Cybershape’s linear feedback suits control-oriented players who prefer spin and consistency over raw pace; its optional CWT magnetic weights allow fine-tuning of final racket balance, a luxury Gaoyuan lacks.
Gaoyuan edges in outright speed and versatility across rubbers, appealing to advanced strikers. Cybershape suits intermediate to advanced counter-topspinners and all-round attackers prioritizing placement and stroke consistency. Cybershape’s Italian wood handle and premium engineering justify its higher price, but Gaoyuan’s carbon layers offer more tournament-level pace. Choose Gaoyuan for modern, fast attack; pick Cybershape if you value dwell-heavy spin, off-center forgiveness, and balancing flexibility.
FAQ
Which is faster?
Gaoyuan is OFF-rated; Cybershape is OFF-minus. Gaoyuan plays noticeably quicker, especially on aggressive strokes.
What are CWT magnetic weights for?
They fine-tune racket balance and weight distribution. You can shift the balance point to suit your stroke preference.
Which has the bigger sweet spot?
Cybershape’s enlarged hexagonal design is notably forgiving. Gaoyuan’s large head is competitive but not quite as generous.
Are both good for beginners?
Cybershape edges slightly ahead due to dwell and forgiveness. Gaoyuan’s speed may overwhelm developing players without solid technique.
Which holds value longer?
Cybershape’s premium build and availability suggest better resale. Gaoyuan’s scarcity hurts resale despite its performance reputation.