Andro Treiber CI OFF vs Stiga Emerald VPS V: Which Should You Buy?
| Andro Treiber CI OFF | Stiga Emerald VPS V | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 |
| feel | woody with carbon kick; firm primary touch, softer follow-through | Stiff, hard outer surface with medium throw angle and large sweet spot |
| handle | FL / AN / ST | Flared (FL), also available in ST and Chinese pen |
| plies | 5 plies (3 wood + 2 inner KVL carbon layers) | 5-ply all wood (Ebenholz/dark outer, VPS-treated middle veneers) |
| speed | OFF | OFF+ |
| thickness_mm | approx 5.9mm | 6.2 |
| weight_g | approx 84-90g | 98 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
These blades pursue opposite philosophies at similar price points. Andro Treiber CI OFF (8.4 rating) is inner-carbon looping specialist—outstanding spin generation and dwell time from its unique kick elasticity, firm primary touch with softer follow-through, balanced at 84-90g.
Stiga Emerald VPS V (8.3 rating) is premium all-wood speed—OFF+ pace from pure wood construction with VPS-treated veneers improving consistency and looping dwell time, large sweet spot making off-center hits forgiving, Green Ebenholz outer delivering stable flat-trajectory drives. The trade-off is stiffness punishing weak or inconsistent technique, lower control scores (approximately 7.2), premium pricing comparable to composites, and heavy weight near 98g causing fatigue in long sessions. For developing looping spin with carbon assistance, Treiber is accessible and balanced; for advanced attackers seeking maximum speed from all-wood while accepting stiffness and weight, Emerald VPS V delivers.
FAQ
I want pure all-wood speed and don’t mind the weight. Which blade should I choose?
Emerald VPS V. OFF+ speed from pure all-wood construction with VPS-treated veneers. Treiber’s inner-carbon provides different speed character, not pure wood.
I’m developing my looping game and want a balanced, helpful blade. Which is better?
Treiber CI. Outstanding spin generation and dwell time are core looping assets. Emerald’s stiffness punishes weak technique and lower control score limits touch development.
Can I use Emerald VPS V for long training sessions without arm fatigue?
At 98g, it is heavy and may fatigue players in long sessions. Treiber at 84-90g is lighter and more practical for extended training. For marathon practice, Treiber is friendlier.
Which blade provides better forgiveness on mis-timed shots?
Treiber. Emerald’s stiffness punishes weak or inconsistent swing technique. If you are still refining your timing, Treiber is more forgiving.
How do they compare on counter-looping at long distance?
Emerald VPS V excels at counter-looping from long distance due to its OFF+ speed and large sweet spot. Treiber is more balanced but not optimized specifically for long-distance counter-looping.