Andro Treiber CI OFF vs Stiga Cybershape Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Andro Treiber CI OFF | Stiga Cybershape Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | woody with carbon kick; firm primary touch, softer follow-through | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade |
| handle | FL / AN / ST | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) |
| plies | 5 plies (3 wood + 2 inner KVL carbon layers) | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) |
| speed | OFF | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) |
| thickness_mm | approx 5.9mm | approx 5 mm |
| weight_g | approx 84-90g | 85 plus or minus 5 g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Treiber CI OFF at 8.4 and Stiga Cybershape Carbon at 8.4 are rated identically but the Cybershape is more advanced. The Treiber is a straightforward inner-carbon blade with distinctive kick for looping specialists. The Cybershape Carbon features an exceptionally large sweet spot positioned higher on a distinctive hexagonal blade shape, head-heavy balance for natural acceleration, CCF inner carbon preserving woody feel, and speed comparable to Butterfly Koto-ALC class blades. The Cybershape is lab-verified by KTH and ITTF approved.
Choose the Treiber if you want a traditional inner-carbon looper with familiar oval blade shape and straightforward mechanics. Pick the Cybershape Carbon if you are advanced, want superior blocking comfort on both wings, prioritize a larger sweet spot and head-heavy balance, and are willing to adapt to a hexagonal head shape that aids serve angles. The Cybershape has short dwell time challenging for heavy topspin, its service feel differs noticeably and requires adaptation, and it is demanding for intermediate players. At 220 EUR, it is premium-priced.
FAQ
What advantage does the hexagonal shape offer?
The distinctive hexagonal head aids serve angles, bat angle awareness, and is ITTF competition approved. Service feel is noticeably different and requires adaptation.
Is the Cybershape really faster?
Yes, its speed rating of 9 out of 10 is comparable to Butterfly Koto-ALC class blades, faster than the Treiber.
Why is the sweet spot positioned higher?
KTH lab tests verified the exceptionally large sweet spot is positioned further up the blade, aiding blocking and aggressive play.
Is the Cybershape good for spinny looping?
Its short dwell time is challenging for heavy topspin. It excels at blocking and counter-attacking, not pure looping specialists.