Stiga Allround Classic vs Tibhar Samsonov Alpha: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Allround Classic | Tibhar Samsonov Alpha | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 7.8/10 |
| feel | soft, high control | medium-stiff, good dwell time, controllable |
| handle | FL/ST/AN | FL/ST |
| plies | 5W | 5-ply all wood (Limba outer plies, Koto/Ayous middle layers) |
| speed | ALL | ALL |
| thickness_mm | 5.1 | 5.9 |
| weight_g | 75 | 85 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Stiga Allround Classic and Tibhar Samsonov Alpha both serve beginner-to-intermediate learners but approach design differently. Classic prioritizes extreme control and soft feel with exceptional dwell time; Samsonov emphasizes lightweight maneuverability and all-around speed, though dwell time is only slightly above average.
Classic is slower and softer, ideal for technique-building and touch mastery. Samsonov is lighter and faster, better suited for players who already have reasonable fundamentals and want a small speed upgrade without abandoning forgiveness.
Both are excellent value blades. Choose Classic if control and learning matter most—it will last for years. Choose Samsonov if lightweight maneuverability appeals to you and technique is already solid. Classic is the ultimate teaching blade; Samsonov is the responsive player blade.
FAQ
Which blade lasts longer?
Stiga Allround Classic. Many owners keep it for 5-plus years, simply upgrading rubbers. Samsonov is solid but less legendary.
Is Samsonov worth buying if I have Classic?
Yes. Samsonov offers a speed upgrade while retaining forgiveness. Both are budget-priced; many players own both.
Which is better for beginners with zero technique?
Stiga Allround Classic. Its soft, dwell-heavy feel and honest feedback teach strokes better than Samsonov.
How much lighter is Samsonov?
Samsonov is 85g, Classic is 75g. Only 10g difference, but it feels noticeably lighter in extended play.