Butterfly Innerforce ZLC vs Xiom Stradivarius: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Innerforce ZLC | Xiom Stradivarius | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | Soft-medium; woody feel with ZLC carbon layers near the core | Crisp and solid with low residual vibration; direct ball contact feel with a large sweet spot |
| handle | AN / FL / ST | Flared (FL), Straight (ST) |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 ZLC carbon (inner ZLC construction) | 5 wood + 2 arylate carbon (Aramid Carbon) |
| speed | OFF | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| weight_g | 84 | ~85-87 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both rate 8.4-8.5 for OFF speed with different carbon philosophies. The Butterfly Innerforce ZLC places carbon inward for woody feel and exceptional dwell; it’s discontinued premium, prized by loopers. The Xiom Stradivarius uses arylate Aramid carbon for crisp, low-vibration feel at a fraction of Butterfly ALC pricing—excellent value for topspin players.
Choose the ZLC if you find one at market price and want the rarest woody carbon feel. Pick Stradivarius if you’re budget-conscious, want solid topspin carbon performance without premium branding, and prefer crisp direct feedback. Both shine for topspin; ZLC rewards refinement, Stradivarius delivers consistency.
FAQ
Which feels more woody?
ZLC decisively—its inner-carbon placement yields the rare woody feel. Stradivarius is crisp, solid, but clearly carbon.
How much cheaper is Stradivarius?
Stradivarius typically undercuts Butterfly ALC blades significantly. ZLC, discontinued, carries inflated pricing; Stradivarius offers comparable play for less.
Which has the larger sweet spot?
Stradivarius: its generous sweet spot forgives off-center hits. ZLC also forgiving but requires slightly better contact.
Which suits close-to-table play better?
ZLC at close range; its dwell and soft feedback excel. Stradivarius strong close to table too, but designed for full court.