Butterfly Innerforce ZLC vs Stiga Allround Classic: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Innerforce ZLC | Stiga Allround Classic | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | Soft-medium; woody feel with ZLC carbon layers near the core | soft, high control |
| handle | AN / FL / ST | FL/ST/AN |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 ZLC carbon (inner ZLC construction) | 5W |
| speed | OFF | ALL |
| thickness_mm | 5.7 | 5.1 |
| weight_g | 84 | 75 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Butterfly Innerforce ZLC and Stiga Allround Classic represent the carbon-versus-all-wood divide at established classic levels. The ZLC combines inner-carbon speed with woody dwell for versatile advanced play. The Classic combines class-leading control and feedback with excellent value and longevity, making it a cornerstone learning blade for generations.
The ZLC suits advanced attackers and mid-range looping. The Classic suits beginners and control-oriented all-round players who value touch, placement, and feedback over raw speed. The ZLC is faster; the Classic has longer dwell and superior feel. The ZLC delivers finishing power; the Classic requires you to supply pace. The Classic is affordable and lasts years with proper maintenance. If you have solid technique and want modern speed, the ZLC. If you are learning strokes or prioritize feel and value, the Classic is a legendary choice.
FAQ
Is the Classic too slow?
Yes, by modern standards. But it generates enough OFF-minus speed for all-round play and relies on technique.
Which blade lasts longer?
The all-wood Classic can last years and pairs better with rubber upgrades. The ZLC is more durable overall.
Can the Classic be used for offensive play?
Yes, as an all-round blade, but it is not optimized for aggressive finishing power.
Which blade teaches better technique?
The Stiga Allround Classic with its honest vibration and dwell gives superior feedback for learning.